THE OFFICIAL COLLEGE OUTREACH ARM OF THE DEMOCRATIC PARTY
Post from S Nelson's Blog:
[Issue Discussion Group] - Welfare
Bad? Brilliant?
You can rate this post.
Register or login now and
tell us what you think.
Obviously, the system is not working the way we'd all like for it to.

I have some personal experience in the system. After my divorce, I wanted to go back and finish my incomplete university degree. I had two small children, no child support, and a low income. To my thinking, someone in that position should have been the welfare system's Golden Child. Working, with 3 years of university already passed, just needing 3 more semesters to complete a degree.... obviously not a habitual welfare recipient.

But what I found was that I had to fight, argue, appeal, struggle, beg and humiliate myself in order to get the assistance that was absolutely necessary if I was going to improve things for myself and my kids. Anyone with less then EXTREME determination would have been deterred by the red tape and the discouraging amount of time that has to be spent literally begging and justifying yourself. It would have been much more simple to give up hope and accept a life of low income unskilled labor and live in low income housing and raise kids with no aspirations.

But that's just one example. The system is broken.

What do we do?

Reader Comments
  
agree
By Lincoln Park Dem Jul 20th 2008 at 10:58 am EDT
I actaully supprt welfare reform. My belief is while people need welfare it should not be the only asnwer. I think many families will need welfare but it should be short term. Perhaps in addition to welfare we need to provide training and child care so people can work. Of course we need a living minimum wage as well.
Re: agree
By AnneK Jul 20th 2008 at 11:11 am EDT
Childcare is a HUGE problem for a lot of women who are stuck in low income situations. It is prohibitive. The current system encourages women to just stay home with their kids instead of going to school or finding a decent job.

Employers are VERY discriminating against single mothers.

I was actually denied a promotion once and the reason given to me was "because you are a single mom."
Re: agree
By Sandi Jul 20th 2008 at 11:41 am EDT
Gender bias issue if the employer has more than 50 employees, State Attorney General's office is where a complaint could have been made. In reality, usually the woman would be fired for exercising her rights. But, it does open up a lawsuit to make changes in how employers behave. The court makes those changes by costing companies money. It is and always be that way.
Re: agree
By LITTLE DINE' FOR RECALL ON COLUMBUS DAY Jul 20th 2008 at 10:48 pm EDT
Link

you were the inspiration Annek Maam, can you help make it come to pass. Peace Little Dine'
I have the same invitation for grandma Spirited Dona.
Re: agree
By AnneK Jul 21st 2008 at 6:20 am EDT
You got it. I like the idea.
  
Questions
By Sandi Jul 20th 2008 at 11:02 am EDT
What year did this happen in? And did anyone tell you about WIA? What area of the country are you in?
Re: Questions
By AnneK Jul 20th 2008 at 11:09 am EDT
This was in 98 in Tennessee. I completed my degrees in Biology and Chemistry in 2000.

No, I have never heard of WIA. What is it? How does it work? And how do we get people to know more about it so that it might help others who need it?
Re: Questions
By Sandi Jul 20th 2008 at 11:26 am EDT
Remember the term One Stop, and if anyone you know needs help going back to school please you or have them look this up in the computer.

Clinton during the welfare reform set this program up. There are a lot of funding grants that can help citizens get an education. Now, since Bush has been in, they have not been funded well. As of July 1, 2008, a small bit of funds have came in. Since my job is HR, I want to be responsible and help my employees if they have to be laid off. I do not just dump them as most employers do. As of July 1, 2008, funding has came available again. I am not sure Congress just did this State by State, but you can call the One Stop for information.

The intake process is: A meeting of layed off workers, and then they give what programs that are funded and where you can fit. The Veterans have funding, layed off workers, populated areas, and unpolulated areas, those that have just got out of prison. Then they put the participants through a 2 1/2 week training period. It is very good, the first four days is training for how to present yourself, resume building, interviewing, a test to see what job suites you best. Then, they have you research what job the person wants and what it takes to get there. How much money is needed, can they find a grant for the individual to meet the individuals goal. They start with a 2 degree goal, or will help finish a bachelors like in your situation. They used to, not anymore, help women open their own businesses and give them a grant to do this. Not anymore, all funds that Bush releases go to other countries to open small businesses in those other countries.

Well, then you after doing the research of what the person wants to do, gets funding by semester, and all books and supplies are included.

My employees, may want just a certification in something, and this is all funded too.
Re: Questions
By Sandi Jul 20th 2008 at 11:32 am EDT
The program, One Stop, is through out the Country and is under the Department of Labor. Also, the Hispanic Community has funded grants for women, it does not matter what race you are. Check in your area, I have gotten some employees in a community college under this program for women. The women have to take extra classes, but these classes are good for women that may not have had training for going into the job market. They go over clothes, how to manage on welfare, or unemployment. They have resources that can include medical insurance. The Catholic entity in the area may have a free or low payment clinic to keep the family afloat for the time period that the woman goes back to school.
Re: Questions
By Sandi Jul 20th 2008 at 11:45 am EDT
All the programs I described also helps women coming out of the home to be able to go back in the job market.

I worked for a woman some years ago, that started a program for women to get back in the workforce, Universities around the country have adopted her program. Check to see if your University has any program as such.
  
Education
By Sandi Jul 20th 2008 at 11:06 am EDT
During the Bush Administration not all the programs were funded. These programs are a carry over from the Clinton Administration. The Congress just funded in a small way effective July 1, 2008.

I know because in the last two weeks, I have researched to help layed off workers. I also posted a note telling about the funding on this site.
Re: Education
By Vidya Jul 20th 2008 at 11:43 pm EDT
Sandi, you sound like you really have your act together. Have learned a lot just from reading your comments on this post, and have always believed you to be someone of substance,.

Anne, I remember a program introduced by the Clinton administration, designed to help single moms on welfare, but it nothing to do with reducing the red tape required in order to receive it. Am sorry you went through such hell.
One more thing..
By Vidya Jul 21st 2008 at 12:01 am EDT
"The current system encourages women to just stay home with their kids instead of going to school or finding a decent job."

I wish you had omitted the word 'just" from that statement, hopefully the reason is self-explanatory.

Good parenting is engaging the imagination of children, taking part in verbal interaction, and constant caregiving and teaching.

There is no such thing as "just" staying home with kids.

In countries more socially evolved than the U.S., parents are encouraged to stay at home with their kids, moms for 2 years, and dads the first 6 months. Yes, that's right, the baby gets both parents full time for the first 6 months and moms full time for the first 2 years.

It is a catch 22 situation in the U.S., however, because in countries like Denmark, Sweden, Norway, Holland, Finland, Iceland etc, it is the companies the parents the work for that provide the paid leave. For example, since education is free in Norway, over 90% of all parents are college educated. To say the comparative statistics in the U.S. are disappointing would be a gross understatement.

Statistically parents without college education have a 200% increase in the the risk factors of having children with learning/behavior disorders, thus making the system of welfare, child care for single mothers without an education even more dysfunctional.

Worse still the likelihood of dropping out of school and or teen pregnancy for kids with EBD and LD is quadruple the rate for Gen. ed. kids. Clearly, education needs to be more accessible to all kids, and young adults, pregnant, single mothers included. I know I harp on education a lot, but if I didn't believe in it with my heart and soul, I would not be in the field I am in.
Re: One more thing..
By AnneK Jul 21st 2008 at 6:27 am EDT
You make a point. Let me clarify what I meant by "just" stay home with the kids.

My opinion is that the way the system is currently set up, it encourages single mothers to believe that staying home with their kids is the only option available to them because all other options are simply not achievable. Childcare is not provided for women who seek higher education, only for those who go to work at some low income job. - And working at a low income job costs benefits such as food stamps and medicaid coverage. So there's no incentive to work for a low income and loss of benefits, and no childcare provision for higher learning. - So with those options effectively removed, stay with the kids is all that's encouraged. There's no option for improving the quality of life that is really supported currently. That's why I included the word "just"
Re: One more thing..
By Vidya Jul 21st 2008 at 9:29 pm EDT
The clarification is noted, yes, it's a problem. With more emphasis on education in more developed/evolved cultures, the problem of uneducated mothers is more likely to be circumvented just by higher education alone.

Education has a way of preparing for stable independent parenting and co-parenting. Planning for education and parenthood is key. A secure stable life for parents means a secure, stable life for their children. Our country seems to have missed that.

Otherwise the rut you describe is very hard to avoid. Getting education accomplished before parenthood is the best way to help the culture, and the system needs to do a better job of instilling that. Of course making education a viable option for parents who need it, single or otherwise needs to be a top priority as well.
Re: One more thing..
By Vidya Jul 21st 2008 at 11:26 pm EDT
Childcare is available now, on site, at most universities/colleges for free, or at a very low cost, and can also be paid by the state via grants, scholarship and or a subsidized loan.
  
Re: every now and then we get a happy coincidence
By Sandi Jul 20th 2008 at 11:13 am EDT
Was it possible to go on SS Disability? I worked with a single woman with 2 small children and we finally got her on SS Disability. Did you try that route?
Re: every now and then we get a happy coincidence
By LITTLE DINE' FOR RECALL ON COLUMBUS DAY Jul 20th 2008 at 10:49 pm EDT
  
Self esteem issue
By AnneK Jul 20th 2008 at 11:19 am EDT
If you've never had to apply for welfare of any kind, then you cannot imagine what appointment after appointment of sitting and filling out papers and answering personal questions and opening up all your private information for scrutiny by some stranger actually does to your self esteem.

Many case workers in the system have become more or less trained to think of all people as cheaters and liars. Having to spend a lot of time PROVING that you are not cheating or lying about how insufficient your means to provide for your children is leaves you with very little self worth. And you wonder why people have a hard time getting themselves out of that?
Re: Self esteem issue
By Sandi Jul 20th 2008 at 11:37 am EDT
My friend is a case worker in Welfare, she has told me about the nightmares. It is very strict and is degrading. She left the Welfare about a year and a half ago. They had a big layoff because of funding, and now the lines and road blocks are bigger.
Re: Self esteem issue
By AnneK Jul 20th 2008 at 11:56 am EDT
Broken. I wish I could just run the whole damn thing. As someone who survived it and got out of it, I know which parts are broken the worst.
Re: Self esteem issue
By SPIRITED DONA Jul 20th 2008 at 10:57 pm EDT
okay, annek, be n charge! i believe u.
5
Re: Self esteem issue
By snakelips Jul 21st 2008 at 7:44 pm EDT
Well, you should have to put out some effort for free money. And as far as your self esteem? Sorry, but Boo-hoo. Those programs aren't there to make you feel good, they're there to make sure you don't die of starvation on the street. Gov't does not exist to make you feel good!

Those case workers have come to think of people as cheaters and liars through EXPERIENCE. They have seen people who they KNOW are cheats and liars get benefits because the law says they have to be provided for. No one likes to be cheated, and it happens every day in the welfare system and is only going to get worse.

Perhaps it wouldn't be such a bad thing to encourage stronger families and family values and communities with faith-based answers. I know those things may fly in the face of lefties because there is some morality involved, but it would go a long way toward easing the welfare problem.

While I don't doubt your sincerity to want to help people, I seriously suspect party leadership of relishing poverty as a way to increase power. After all, if you're fighting to survive, it sure is easier to throw a vote to the guy who gave you a fish instead of the guy offering to teach you to fish. And so, the cycle continues....

-snakelips
  
Annek
By SPIRITED DONA Jul 20th 2008 at 10:56 pm EDT
buy me a dr pepper? without kids-- there is zero welfare in tn. zero. they took my health care away. there is no safety net. i have put on my blog to Bishar."have u met, Annek?" lol! the kid is killin' my comedy act! lol!
  
well hell yes of course the system is broken
By Liz Jul 20th 2008 at 11:01 pm EDT
Look who our skipper has been for the past 8 years.

It's damn amazing that our ship of state is even still afloat.

As for welfare, the reason we don't have any left over for the people who really do need a hand up is because the jackass in the white house has been giving all the welfare to his buddies--the ones who own corporations like Halliburton and Bechtel and Bear Stearns.
Re: well hell yes of course the system is broken
By Sandi Jul 20th 2008 at 11:23 pm EDT
More accurately, faith based churches.
Re: well hell yes of course the system is broken
By AnneK Jul 21st 2008 at 6:31 am EDT
Yea, but the things I wrote about all happened DURING the Clinton administration from 98-2000.

And Welfare to work DIDN'T include people who were in universities finishing bachelor's degrees.
Re: well hell yes of course the system is broken
By snakelips Jul 21st 2008 at 8:15 pm EDT
That should provide some evidence as to the real motivation of welfare (by leadership).

-snakelips
  
Re: well hell yes of course the system is broken
By Sandi Jul 21st 2008 at 1:25 am EDT
Welfare to work has a history in the Clinton Administration. It was not a hand out, but a hand up. He funded education, 4 year degree, and gave minorities and women with a grant to own their own business. One of the women spoke at the opening of the Clinton Library. I finished my degree and owe my gratitude to the Clinton's. In fact, I was awarded a grant for the down payment of my first home that I bought on my own.
  
What I see
By Gretchen Jul 21st 2008 at 1:27 am EDT
a lot of is the people who do everything to stay off of welfare-- Their families are suffering but they don't want to ask for help-- AND then there are the people who call me to have the call in a prescription for tylenol because they know that they are covered by their medical coupons-- They have their cell phone an I-pod in one hand but want the state to pay for their tylenol...

Some people work 3 jobs and will do anything not to get onto welfare and others will do anything possible to stay on welfare-- They feel like the state owes them...
Re: What I see
By Gretchen Jul 21st 2008 at 1:29 am EDT
This is a true story-- We had a woman who lived in China-- She decided she wanted to have an American baby-- So she bought her ticket at the end of her pregnancy-- Arrived here-- Applied for state welfare-- had no income so they gave it to her-- She had her baby here-- paid for by my tax money-- Then 6 weeks after her baby was born flew home with her American baby!!! TRUE STORY!!! (Oh and because she didn't speak English the state also paid $50.00/hour for her to have an interpreter!!)
Re: What I see
By Gretchen Jul 21st 2008 at 1:30 am EDT
She must have been somewhat wealthy in China to be able to afford to do what she did????
  
I don't believe it!
By CaroleB Jul 21st 2008 at 9:30 am EDT
I was off-line last night and just now read this entire blog. I was truly (and happily!) amazed! AN ENTIRE BLOG WITHOUT A SINGLE FLAME! AN ENTIRE BLOG WITH ONLY SERIOUS DISCUSSION AND EXAMPLES!!

I am so proud of everyone who responded here. THIS is what PB is supposed to be, people!!

My son got his graduate degree in Holland and is now working for a Dutch company, so he's basically been in Holland for 4 years (with one year out living and working in Kathmandu, Nepal). The way the Dutch handle "welfare" is amazing. First, all of their education system is free (preschool through university). They will totally fund 2 years for a family (and that is anyone with children, married or single). They provide them with housing, pay their utilities, provide them with their equivalent of food stamps. In return, the recipient attends school or trade training. At the end of the training, they are guaranteed a job (government help in finding one). After two years, ALL support is cut off except for the normal government-sponsored support (child care, etc.).

Additionally, the government will support up to two children for a single mom. If she has more than two, she gets no more money for any additional. (Compare with our system which will add on money for each out-of-wedlock child. Wanna get a raise? Have more kids!)

Okay. Enough here, since this is an old blog and nobody is still reading it (except me)! LOL
Re: I don't believe it!
By AnneK Jul 21st 2008 at 9:59 am EDT
Nope, It was posted on Sunday - a lot of people haven't seen it yet, but will today.
  
Great topic, AnneK
By Jacob Clark Jul 21st 2008 at 9:13 pm EDT
I'm online right now and I think this is an excellent topic for conversation. Social Services offices are often overwhelmed with new clients, they are understaffed and underpaid for what they do. I worked for several years as a counselor and made referrals to Medicaid and Social Services. This was in California, where MEDICAID is called MEDI-CAL.

I have had my own dealings with Medi-cal, Dept. of Rehab. and some private charities. I was homeless for a short time in L.A in 1999. I received great support from a private charity who made referrals to social service agencies for me, so I was extremely lucky in that respect. Thank god I was only homeless for 8 days, it was a total nightmare being on the street.

Anyway, I had great social workers, particularly those in the Dept. of Rehabilitation. But that all occurred in California which is very much more progressive than most states. I don't think I would want to be homeless in the Seattle area, where I now live, as I have heard horror stories from friends about rudeness etc.