THE OFFICIAL COLLEGE OUTREACH ARM OF THE DEMOCRATIC PARTY
Homeowner's Rights
Bad? Brilliant?
You can rate this post.
Register or login now and
tell us what you think.
I'll keep this quick and dirty. I have been researching the role of Homeowner Associations in Maryland. Before the end of the month I will hopefully post a link to an op-ed I am writing on this subject. If it no newspaper wants to publish the op-ed, well that is the beauty of the Internet now isn't it. I'll just publish it here.

The thing is of the people who I have spoken to by going neighborhood to neighborhood their is an overwhelmingly negative opinion of homeowner associations (HOA). I have heard one over riding sentiment; it is my home, the most expensive thing I will probably ever buy, no one has the right to tell me what I can and can not do with it. An example of something HOA's like to ban - window air conditioners. One home owner who supports the ban said if they can't afford to run their central AC, the should consider moving to a cheaper home!

I am an experienced real estate title searcher. Deeds used to contain restrictions that banned the following on the property: No niggers, pigs, goats, chickens or Jews. Obviously the reference to two races were outlawed by the Fair Housing Act. The keeping of live stock is regulated by zoning laws. The thing is the point of these restrictions was to insure that property values in the neighborhood weren't impacted by the actions of any one homeowner. This is the exact same justification for the existence of HOA's. So we haven't really come that far have we?

Reader Comments
  
Good entry.
By Ryan Sep 7th 2007 at 9:40 am EDT
About a year ago in my area, a man had a lot of his property that was stored in a very ugly fashion outside his house. Needless to say this had a negative impact on the property values in the area and he was warned to clean up.

He did not do an adequate job, and so the city came and tore up his yard with heavy machinery hauling the stuff away to be disposed of. Up until that point I can see the justification for it. I don't particularly agree with it, but I can understand why that would be done. However, they then charged him for the labor and the equipment used and everything else - he was told to pay a sum of over $10,000.

It's not the same as a Home Owner's Association, but it is certainly related. The cost of doing something like this should be the disincentive for violating a person's rights and encourage peaceful resolution to problems before such drastic measures are taken. For a person to be told to pay $10,000 without a trial or hearing or even breaking the law is absurd.

The HOA is no different. It's the same principle. They don't have the right to do what they do. Thanks for the good entry.
Re: Good entry.
By Barry C aka Casey Sep 7th 2007 at 1:11 pm EDT
Thanks Ryan, municipal governemnts do have the right to declare a property an eyesore. Again this is very subjective. We have an antique plow in our front garden. Our HOA challenged our right to have circa 1800's plow in our garden - they backed down. That is the thing about HOA's if you challenge them they usually back down. Wait 'til I do the full op-ed you won't believe some of the stuff we have had to put up with in my neighborhood.