Alternet has an article by Steve Rizzo talking about the intention of one candidate to either win the Democratic nomination or destroy the party. (That isn't exactly what he said; but that's the way it seems to me.) It is well written and helps to back up what FOS said earlier Throw mud, throw mud, throw mud, see what sticks.

Okay, the Natalie Portman line is hilarious.Photo: maxim.com
For some reason, Ann Coulter's comment that Jews should be "perfected" has really gotten the Internet going (as opposed to her comments that 9/11 widows are “self-obsessed” and "enjoying" their husbands' deaths, or that John Edwards is a "faggot," yadda yadda yadda). Coulter said the quote to Donny Deutsch (a Jew) on his show, The Big Idea, last week. But like you, the Internet sometimes comes up with its best responses several days after a slight is delivered...
from the Daily Intelligencer
I am making a proposal here to have a nationwide 'Telecom Strike'. After the sad, sad support the FISA Bill got in the Senate, I feel the only voice left is that of the people themselves.
If we have ONE day where all computers shut down, all phones cease, even ATM and credit transactions stop - we can effectively look AT&T in the eye and say,
"Up yours, Jack".
NO MORE SPYING
No MORE IMMUNITY FOR CRIMINAL ACTS.
This retroactive immunity ploy effectively gives ANY Executive the power to do ANYTHING he likes in the future - because then he can grant all his henchmen 'immunity' after the fact. Please sign the petition at Firedoglake.
It isn't over. We are pushing members of the House to stand firm against telecom immunity -- please take a little time to sign the petition here. Have you called your Representative today?
has a good one titled 'Rush Limbaugh Takes on Quantum Physics (and Global Warming) ^o^
Everybody's favorite cosmologist and climatologist, Rush Limbaugh, did a little bit yesterday on how global warming can't possibly be happening, because, come on, climatologists can't even accurately predict how many hurricanes are coming each year.
if McCain gets the nomination. She says.
So, what does this mean? Ann Coulter worked like a dog to help destroy Bill Clinton, and inveighed against his administration every chance she got. Suddenly she's on the air talking to Sean Hannity, and ahe's going to campaign for Clinton because she's "more conservative than John McCain"? During the course of the "interview" she mentions that Hillary "stood up and applauded" the Surge, while also mentioning that McCain is "soft on torture".
Here's the way I see it: She's a rabid Republican. The show she's on is rabidly conservative. She lies a lot.
I think it's pure propaganda. Rove et al worked hard to destroy McCain last time around, and they probably haven't changed their minds. What they are trying to accomplish here is murky, though. Why would they try to paint McCain as a liberal, unless they are trying to appeal to disaffected Democrats? McCain is emphatically not a liberal, and he has approved Bush and his War throughout. Since his only competitor is Romney, who is actually a weathervane in a suit, and thus unpredictable, it seems to me that McCain would be their best hope.
The Right has been excoriating Hillary since the campaign began, calling her everything but an out and out Communist. Now she's a Conservative? They can't seem to make up their minds - publically, at least. Privately, I have to think that this is a deliberate campaign. What the goal is remains to be seen.
For every disaffected Democrat they win with a strategy like this, they will lose ten Republicans. It's rather fun to watch the GOP eat its young, much like the Democrats have been. There's only one question left for me: does Corporate America want Romney or McCain?